Guys who possess intercourse with males are banned from offering bloodstream in England, Scotland and Wales for 3 months after sexual intercourse - however some are choosing to break the principles.
"It galls me personally each time we hear an advert from the radio asking for folks to provide blood, when there is a massive portion of culture that is simply rejected that for no valid reason," claims David - perhaps maybe not their genuine name.
He could be an intimately active homosexual guy whom donates bloodstream towards the NHS many times a 12 months.
"we spent my youth in a family group whom provided bloodstream frequently and instilled he tells the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme in me that that was the right thing to do.
"we achieved it before we began making love with males - and I also continued doing it a short while later because, in my situation, that has been the proper thing to accomplish."
In 2017, guidelines had been calm in England, Scotland and mexican dating sites Wales to permit males that have intercourse with males to provide bloodstream after abstaining from sex for 3 months.
Formerly, that they had to attend a 12 months - which continues to be the situation in north ireland.
NHS Blood and Transplant - the organization that takes care of bloodstream in England - claims the schedule exists because, while all contributions are screened, "there was a time period contact that is following any illness with regards to wouldn't be detected by our testing tests".
The Advisory Committee in the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) - which suggests UK wellness divisions - suggested the changes after concluding testing that is new had been accurate and donors had been good at complying with all the guidelines.
It implemented campaigning from LGBT organisations. However for some, it's still perhaps maybe maybe not sufficient.
David states the statutory legislation stays "rooted in deep homophobia".
"I do not understand why i will be rejected the legal rights to simply help other people," he states.
"truly I do not think the individuals whoever everyday lives i have possibly conserved would grumble."
Expected why he takes the chance, once you understand doctors think it unsafe, he claims he practises safe intercourse and it is tested with greater regularity than heterosexual individuals.
" No straight individual we understand goes and gets examined every half a year," he claims.
David, like many males the programme talked compared to that breach that is knowingly guidelines, states he takes the Prep drug each and every day - that may avoid users from contracting HIV.
Nevertheless, SaBTO's instructions states those people who have used PrEP inside the past 3 months is not accepted due to issues regarding how it may effect on HIV testing outcomes.
Su Brailsford, a consultant in wellness security at NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), claims it really is "very concerned" by the programme's findings.
Donating before 3 months is certainly not unlawful and even though the NHSBT has methods in position to guard blood circulation, it cannot presently stop individuals such as David donating when they lie during donor wellness checks.
Ms Brailsford says: " The security associated with the really sick individuals who receive bloodstream is our number 1 concern.
"Blood contribution exists for clients, perhaps not for bloodstream donors.
"Anybody can obtain an infection that is blood-borne a std however some folks have a heightened threat of visibility.
"At a populace degree, males that have intercourse with guys have actually an increased risk.
"Using security such as for instance a condoms or Prep can lessen this danger but may well not cure it.
"we must start thinking about not just the donor but in addition the prospective dangers of the partner."
"All donors need to finish the donor wellness check if they visited donate - so it is not only males that have sex with men whom we enquire about what kind of intercourse they are having."
The reality around bloodstream contribution
Supply: NHS Blood and Transplant
The security associated with British's blood circulation has been recently within the limelight.
Families have now been evidence that is giving an inquiry examining why lots of people within the 1970s and 80s got contaminated blood items from high-risk sources - with several contracting hepatitis B or C or HIV.
But times have actually changed and bloodstream screening has enhanced, leading numerous to recommend the wait that is three-month donate must be paid down further.
The campaign team Freedom to Donate promotions on this problem.
However for the charity's Ethan Spibey, "it's not helpful" for folks to split the principles.
Ryan - maybe perhaps maybe not their genuine title - was donating bloodstream, up against the guidelines, for almost ten years.
The rules are said by him makes him feel he could be inadequate and their bloodstream doesn't matter.
"It really is perhaps not good you are almost discriminated against and you also understand that you're doing something you really should not be doing," he states.
"But during the time that is same morally, you will be assisting some other person by giving bloodstream."
Ryan provides bloodstream after guaranteeing their mother he'd medically continue to donate whatever he could, soon before she abruptly died.
He claims he wouldn't normally start thinking about abstaining from intercourse so that you can provide bloodstream in which he takes precautions over their intimate wellness.
Asked whether he had been concerned others providing bloodstream wouldn't be as careful, he said there would be a danger - including with heterosexuals.
"just how many heterosexual folks have sex without contraceptive products or condoms or any such thing? just How much danger are they using?" he asks.
"I do not believe that who we elect to have relations that are sexual, or autumn in deep love with, need to have any bearing on offering blood."
Proceed with the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme on Twitter and Twitter - and find out a lot more of our stories right here.